Weekly News

The US Needs to Face Up to Its Long History of Election Meddling

July 22,2018 16:08

Last Sunday morning, CNN's Jake Tapper interviewed Kentucky Senator Rand Paul about Russian interference in the 2016 election. At 7:40 AM, a CNN analyst named Josh Campbell tweeted some of Paul's comments. He quoted the senator as declaring ...

That’s a problem. Discussing America’s history of electoral interference has never been more necessary. It’s necessary not so Americans can downplay the severity of Russia’s election attack. It’s necessary so Americans can determine how—and how not—to respond. The less Americans know about America’s history of electoral interference, the more likely they are to acquiesce to—or even cheer—its return. That’s dangerous because, historically, American meddling has done far more to harm democracy than promote it.
What many Russians, but few Americans, know is that 20 years before Russia tried to swing an American presidential election, America tried to swing a presidential election in Russia. The year was 1996. Boris Yeltsin was seeking a second term, and Bill Clinton desperately wanted to help. “I want this guy to win so bad,” he told Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, “it hurts.”
Clinton liked Yeltsin personally. He considered him Russia’s best hope for embracing democracy and capitalism. And he appreciated Yeltsin’s acquiescence during NATO’s march eastward, into the former Soviet bloc.
Unfortunately for Clinton, ordinary Russians appreciated their leader far less. Yeltsin’s “shock-therapy” economic reforms had reduced the government’s safety net, and produced a spike in unemployment and inflation. Between 1990 and 1994, the average life expectancy among Russian men had dropped by an astonishing six years. When Yeltsin began his reelection campaign in January 1996, his approval rating stood at 6 percent, lower than Stalin’s.
So the Clinton administration sprang into action. It lobbied the International Monetary Fund to give Russia a $10 billion loan, some of which Yeltsin distributed to woo voters. Upon arriving in a given city, he often announced, “My pockets are full.”
Three American political consultants—including Richard Dresner, a veteran of Clinton’s campaigns in Arkansas—went to work on Yeltsin’s reelection bid. Every week, Dresner sent the White House the Yeltsin campaign’s internal polling. And before traveling to meet Yeltsin in April, Clinton asked Dresner what he should say in Moscow to boost his buddy’s campaign.
It worked. In a stunning turnaround, Yeltsin—who had begun the campaign in last place—defeated his communist rival in the election’s final round by 13 percentage points. Talbott declared that “a number of international observers have judged this to be a free and fair election.” But Michael Meadowcroft, a Brit who led the election-observer team of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, later claimed there had been widespread voter fraud, which he had been pressured not to expose. In Chechnya, which international observers believe contained fewer than 500,000 adults, one million people voted, and Yeltsin—despite prosecuting a brutal war in the region—won exactly 70 percent. “They’d been bombed out of existence, and there they were all supposedly voting for Yeltsin,” exclaimed Meadowcroft. “It’s like what happens in Cameroon.” Thomas Graham, who served as the chief political analyst at the U.S. embassy in Moscow during the campaign, later conceded that Clinton officials knew the election wasn’t truly fair. “This was a classic case,” he admitted, “of the ends justifying the means.”

Cold War,United States,electoral interference,America,Russian electoral interference,War election meddling,American presidential election,Russian electoral meddling,left-leaning candidates America,U.S. national-security interests.,Pearl Harbor—discussing America,particular candidates,Russian interference,American political consultants—including,Cold War–style meddling,America’s history,Russia’s election,large majority—like Russia,foreign elections,European elections,Senator Rand Paul,Cold War habits,American meddling,favor particular candidates,Special Counsel Robert,African American vote,journalist David Corn,International Monetary Fund,pro-Russian political party,State Strobe Talbott,chief political analyst,America’s interventions,College political scientist,U.S. policy establishment,Russia’s interference,voter fraud,America’s misdeeds,War–style political subversion,American interference,average life expectancy,international observers,Cheddi Jagan—helped Jagan,widespread voter fraud,Yeltsin,power balance,International Republican Institute—helped,America’s ox,Covert Regime Change,television station RT—which,vibrant civil society

Share this article

Related videos

Everything Trump And Putin Said On Russian Meddling | CNBC
Everything Trump And Putin Said On Russian Medd...
Putin says Russia has never interfered with US internal affairs
Putin says Russia has never interfered with US ...

DON'T MISS THIS STORIES