Weekly News

Madeleine Albright: How to Protect the World From North Korea

December 05,2017 06:15

When the two met in the Oval Office soon after the 2016 election, Barack Obama reportedly told Donald Trump that the Democratic Republic of North Korea, or D.P.R.K., would be the most serious national security challenge he would face as president ...


Like Mr. Trump, President Bill Clinton was confronted by North Korean belligerence early on. In 1993, the D.P.R.K. threatened to withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and remove the fuel rods from its nuclear reactor, extracting the weapons-grade plutonium they contained — enough to fuel half a dozen nuclear warheads.
Photo
Madeleine Albright Credit Timothy Greenfield-SandersThis precipitated a crisis between Washington and Pyongyang. Our focus was on stopping the D.P.R.K. from developing nuclear weapons, so we applied pressure at the United Nations while also considering our other options, up to and including military strikes aimed at North Korea’s nuclear reactor.
Fortunately, through diplomacy, a military clash was avoided. Working closely with our allies, we vigorously engaged with North Korea to conclude an accord we called the Agreed Framework. This required the North to shut down its reactor, seal 8,000 fuel rods containing reprocessed plutonium and freeze its plutonium production facilities, under inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency. In return, the United States and our allies agreed to help North Korea cope with its immediate fuel shortages and pay for the construction of two civilian nuclear power plants.
The Agreed Framework was not perfect, and implementation fell short on both sides. But it ended the immediate crisis and prevented the North from realizing its potential to develop dozens of nuclear bombs. Had it not been in place, experts have estimated that the D.P.R.K. would have possessed between 50 and 100 nuclear weapons by the time the Bush administration took office. Instead, to our knowledge it had none.
To this day, I remain the highest-ranking sitting United States official to have traveled to North Korea. Kim Jong-il, the current leader’s father, and I held two days of intensive talks, during which he appeared willing to accept more significant restraints on the missile programs than we had expected.
When the Bush administration came in, it declined to continue negotiations and pursued a more confrontational strategy. By 2003, the Agreed Framework had collapsed. By 2006, North Korea had tested its first nuclear device.
Leaving office, I felt there were many possible directions in which events on the Korean Peninsula might unfold. Unfortunately, after many twists and turns, they have come full circle. The Trump administration is now facing the very specter Mr. Clinton had feared: a North Korea armed with enough nuclear bombs to threaten its neighbors — and the United States — while deterring incoming attacks.
Obviously, if this dilemma were easy to resolve, it would have been settled long ago. The fundamental problem is that the North Korean leadership is convinced it requires nuclear weapons to guarantee its own survival. For confirmation, it need only ponder the fate of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar el-Qaddafi.
However, the most promising way to stabilize the situation does not differ all that much from the Clinton administration’s approach. The United States’ policy toward North Korea should include diplomatic pressure, enhanced military deterrence, close coordination with South Korea and Japan, and a willingness to engage in direct talks, not as a reward to Pyongyang but as a means of doing what is necessary to protect our own security.
For too long, American policy has searched in vain for a deft, simple solution to North Korea’s nuclear ambitions. The hope has been that the regime in Pyongyang would change, or that China would force it to capitulate. The result has been a backward slide, forfeiting prior gains without substituting anything new. It is time for a more realistic and serious approach — one that exhausts the possibilities of diplomacy, protects our citizens and does not plunge the world into an unnecessary war.

Nuclear Weapons,North Korea,United States International Relations,Nuclear Tests,Albright Madeleine K

Share this article

Related videos

Madeleine Albright: How to Protect the World From North Korea
Madeleine Albright: How to Protect the World Fr...
Madeleine albright: how to protect the world from north korea
Madeleine albright: how to protect the world fr...

DON'T MISS THIS STORIES