Weekly News

Brett Kavanaugh's Confirmation Would Be a Gift to Big Business

July 12,2018 14:13

That shift could trigger interlocked political consequences that unfold for years. From one direction, it could help the GOP answer one of the most delicate questions of the Donald Trump era: how to maintain the allegiance of business amid widespread ...

With that history, Kavanaugh, if he’s confirmed, would join the four other Republican-appointed justices to produce a Court possibly more hostile to federal administrative authority over business than at any point in at least 80 years, predicts Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas law professor who closely tracks the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals where Kavanaugh has served since 2006.
In a process that began with the landmark Lochner v. New York case in 1905, conservative Supreme Court majorities early in the 20th century routinely struck down as unconstitutional federal and state limits on business behavior, such as maximum-work-hour rules. That process peaked when the Supreme Court—at the time dominated by seven members appointed by previous Republican presidents—invalidated a succession of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s early New Deal measures. Roosevelt responded in 1937 with legislation that allowed him to make more appointments by enlarging the Court’s size. Though Congress rejected FDR’s “court-packing” plan, the justices, under political pressure, changed direction to uphold more of Roosevelt’s measures—a process famously described as the “switch in time that saved nine.”
Vladeck says he can easily imagine similar conflicts recurring between five Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices and the next Democratic president. “It’s not hard to see a narrative where we see the interbranch battles of the 1930s repeating, and where we get to a point where you have a Democratic Congress and a Democratic president routinely thwarted by a deeply conservative Supreme Court,” he says.
Vladeck and other observers have noted a sharp contrast in Kavanaugh’s judicial record and legal writings. On the one hand, he has argued for greater deference to presidential authority; on the other, he has insisted on greater scrutiny of federal administrative actions. That perspective, Vladeck notes, translates in Kavanaugh’s record to “broad deference to the executive branch on foreign policy and national security,” coupled with extreme skepticism on domestic regulation. On each front, that precisely aligns Kavanaugh with the dominant view among conservatives about the executive branch’s proper role.
On the D.C. Circuit Court, he’s been especially aggressive about invalidating federal regulatory actions, such as the Federal Communications Commission’s net-neutrality rules. And Kavanaugh has been particularly tough on the Environmental Protection Agency, repeatedly ruling against its authority to regulate mercury, toxic emissions, air pollution that crosses state lines, and the greenhouse gases linked to global climate change. (The latter position could be particularly pivotal because Justice Anthony Kennedy, whom Kavanaugh would replace, provided the pivotal fifth vote in the landmark 2007 Supreme Court decision that required the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases.) More broadly, Kavanaugh has repeatedly questioned the validity of the Court’s “Chevron” doctrine, which says that regulatory agencies deserve deference in how to interpret the laws they administer. That’s music to the ears of C-suite general counsels.

Kavanaugh,Supreme Court,Kavanaugh law clerk,precisely aligns Kavanaugh,Brett Kavanaugh,conservative Supreme Court,D.C. Circuit Court,federal regulatory actions,Judge Kavanaugh,Kavanaugh’s record,Kavanaugh appointment,Donald Trump era,Supreme Court justices,Supreme Court majorities,generous judicial deference,Court consistently resistant,Supreme Court decision,federal regulation,regulatory actions point,federal administrative authority,deeply conservative Supreme,corporate leaders,Federal Communications Commission,congressional Republican majorities,federal administrative actions,business,Texas law professor,New York case,Senator Bernie Sanders,George Mason University,Franklin D. Roosevelt,Democratic president,early New Deal,exempt corporate America,agency action,Environmental Protection Agency,conservative judicial appointments,executive branch,C-suite general counsels,GOP-leaning white-collar whites,white racial resentments,global climate change,lower approval ratings,greenhouse gases,Justice Anthony Kennedy,greater deference,Stephen Vladeck,broad deference,Vladeck notes,business behavior

Share this article

Related videos

The 700 Club - July 11, 2018
The 700 Club - July 11, 2018
PBS NewsHour full episode July 06, 2018
PBS NewsHour full episode July 06, 2018